different
from that used for research purposes. In a
research interview, questions are preset and the goal is
consistency with the aim of reducing variability. In
investigative interviews, the purpose is to pick up “leads”.
While there are a basic set of points to be covered (child
care and restaurant exposures, IV drug use, etc), responses
drive the interview. Names of specific establishments are
not used in order to avoid biasing respondents. Once the
public is aware of a problem with a particular establishment,
the effectiveness of interviewing is significantly compromised.
It was difficult to maintain a neutral voice tone and confine
comments to a calm “Uh huh” when the sixth person has just
told you they shopped at the same store as the other five persons.
The occurrence of the sewer break threw a real wrench into
this investigation as we now had 2 possible sources to contend
with. Although we had 9 persons who shopped at the same market,
this was one of the largest in the area and it was quite possible
that this reflected shopping patterns of area residents rather
than the source of infection. We needed a comparison group.
We could have used neighbor controls but the hour was late
and we didn’t want to raise public awareness until and unless
it was unecessary.
|