Previous
Next

Index
The above examples demonstrate not only the two main types of foodborne outbreaks encountered in public health settings but also how epidemiologic and laboratory data are used together to determine the cause of the problem. Although the interview data in the first example was inconclusive, the clinical picture led us to consider Staph as the most likely cause and the absence of illness in children who did not eat the school lunch and identification of outliers provided evidence of a
    foodborne cause. Epidemiologic data can direct laboratory investigations by narrowing the lists of both suspect food items and potential pathogens. Conversations with laboratorians in the earliest stage of the investigation about preliminary data and the availability of various assays, specimen collection and transport can save a lot of frustration for both groups later on. In the second example, epidemiologic data focused our efforts on the deli and resulted in considerable follow-up activities. We did not receive notification of a HAV-IgM positive deli worker until the very latter stage of the investigation. In situations where food samples or testing are not available, epidemiologic data may be the only source of information. In this instance, the contaminated food was gone long before onset of the first case.

Slide 21 of 25